TheArmedScotsman TheArmedScotsman

Sig P365 .380 vs S&W Bodyguard 2.0 .380

Get the Bodyguard 2.0 here: https://alnk.to/btpHMyp

Get the Sig P365 here: https://alnk.to/eOO6q3V

Sig P365 .380 vs. Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0: Battle of the .380 
The Sig Sauer P365-380 and Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 are two of the most compelling .380 ACP pistols for concealed carry, each offering high capacity and modern features in compact packages. Designed for deep concealment, they cater to shooters prioritizing ease of carry and reliability. But which is the better everyday carry (EDC) option? This comparison evaluates their design, performance, and practicality based on hands-on testing and user feedback to help you choose.
Overview
Sig Sauer P365-380
Launched in 2022, the P365-380 is a .380 ACP adaptation of the popular P365 9mm platform. Tailored for recoil-sensitive shooters or those with smaller hands, it maintains the P365’s modularity and capacity while delivering softer recoil. With a 10+1 flush-fit magazine (and optional 12+1 or 15-round magazines), an optics-ready slide, and SIGLITE night sights, it’s a versatile micro-compact for concealed carry.
Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0
Introduced in July 2024, the Bodyguard 2.0 is a complete redesign of the original Bodyguard .380, transforming it into a modern pocket pistol. It features a 10+1 flush-fit magazine (12+1 extended), a striker-fired system, and a tritium front sight. At just 11.48 ounces with a 10-round magazine, it’s one of the lightest .380s, optimized for deep concealment.
Size and Concealability
  • P365-380: Measures 5.8 inches long, 1.1 inches wide, and 4.2 inches tall with a 10-round magazine, weighing 17.88 ounces loaded. Its compact size suits inside-the-waistband (IWB) or appendix carry, but its weight and dimensions make it less ideal for pocket carry unless paired with a holster like the DeSantis Nemesis and worn in larger pockets, such as cargo pants.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: At 5.5 inches long, 0.88 inches wide, and 4 inches tall with a 10-round magazine, it’s smaller and slimmer, weighing only 11.48 ounces loaded. Its lightweight design and rounded edges make it disappear in a pocket, especially with a holster like the Vedder Pocket Locker, minimizing printing even in tight clothing like dress pants or gym shorts.
Winner: Bodyguard 2.0. Its smaller footprint and lighter weight make it the top choice for pocket carry, particularly for minimalist or summer wardrobes. The P365-380 excels for IWB carry but feels bulky in a pocket.
Ergonomics and Grip
  • P365-380: The P365-380 inherits the P365 9mm’s grip module, offering a textured, comfortable hold that fits most hand sizes with a 10- or 12-round magazine. Its modularity allows aftermarket grip options, such as Wilson Combat modules, for customization. However, the grip can feel bulky for pocket carry and slightly small for larger hands without an extended magazine.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: Features a standout grip with aggressive 360-degree stippling, balancing control and comfort without abrading skin or clothing. The grip accommodates a full one-handed hold with the 10-round magazine, while the 12-round magazine allows large-handed shooters to place all fingers. A high grip cut and trigger guard undercut reduce recoil, though some users report slide bite without proper grip technique.
Winner: Bodyguard 2.0. Its grip optimizes control in a smaller package, enhancing shootability for a pocket pistol. The P365-380’s grip is excellent but better suited for IWB carry due to its size.
Trigger and Action
  • P365-380: Its striker-fired trigger, with a pull weight around 5.5 pounds, offers smooth take-up, a crisp break, and a positive reset. Consistent and predictable, it’s ideal for shooters familiar with the P365 platform, supporting rapid, accurate follow-up shots.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: Also striker-fired, it features a flat-faced trigger with a 4–5-pound pull, minimal take-up, and a clean break. The reset is slightly longer than the P365’s, potentially slowing rapid shots. Some users note the trigger safety can pinch during extended shooting, but it’s among the best in its class.
Winner: P365-380. Its smoother trigger and shorter reset give it a slight edge for precision and speed.
Sights
  • P365-380: Equipped with SIGLITE night sights featuring tritium inserts for low-light performance. The optics-ready slide supports red dots like the ROMEOZero Elite, adding versatility. The sights are quick to acquire and precise, even at longer ranges.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: Features a tritium front sight with an orange outline and a blacked-out, serrated U-notch rear sight. The setup is fast for close-range defensive shooting but less precise beyond 15 yards due to the wide U-notch. Some units have misaligned sights, requiring adjustment. No optics cut limits customization.
Winner: P365-380. Its night sights and optics compatibility offer greater flexibility and precision, especially in low light or at range. The Bodyguard 2.0’s sights are effective but less versatile.
Capacity
  • P365-380: Provides 10+1 rounds with the flush-fit magazine and 12+1 or 15+1 with extended magazines. Compatibility with 9mm P365 magazines (for .380 ammo) adds flexibility for range use.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: Matches with 10+1 (flush-fit) and 12+1 (extended) magazines. It lacks cross-platform magazine compatibility but delivers impressive capacity for its size.
Winner: Tie. Both offer identical standard capacities, with the P365-380 slightly ahead for its 15+1 option.
Recoil and Shootability
  • P365-380: Renowned for its soft recoil, often likened to a .22 LR. The heavier slide and optimized recoil spring minimize muzzle flip, making it ideal for recoil-sensitive shooters or beginners. Testers find it easy to shoot accurately with minimal effort.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: Manages recoil well for its light weight, comparable to a 9mm Shield Plus. The low bore axis and ergonomic grip control muzzle rise, but it’s snappier than the P365-380. Its shootability encourages practice without discomfort.
Winner: P365-380. Its softer recoil enhances comfort and ease, especially for extended shooting or new shooters.
Reliability
  • P365-380: Highly reliable with most ammunition, though some users report feeding issues with specific brands. Its proven P365 platform ensures durability, with most testers experiencing flawless performance after hundreds of rounds.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: Early units had feeding issues, particularly with the 12-round magazine, and some sight misalignment. Proper lubrication and a break-in period often resolve these, with Smith & Wesson offering warranty fixes like feed ramp polishing. Recent reports confirm strong reliability with defensive ammo like Federal Hydra-Shok Deep and Hornady Critical Defense.
Winner: P365-380. Its mature platform has fewer initial issues, though the Bodyguard 2.0 is reliable post-break-in.
Carry Practicality
  • P365-380: Best for IWB or appendix carry due to its size and weight. It’s a versatile all-season option but feels noticeable in a pocket. Optics compatibility and accessory support suit shooters wanting a customizable EDC.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: Excels as a true pocket pistol, vanishing in lightweight clothing with a quality holster. The optional thumb safety (TS model) enhances pocket carry security, while the NTS model’s trigger safety is reliable. Its simplicity and light weight are ideal for summer or minimalist carry.
Winner: Bodyguard 2.0. Its compact size and light weight make it unmatched for pocket carry. The P365-380 is better for holster carry or optics users.
Price
  • P365-380: MSRP around $499, often retailing for $450–$500, reflecting its optics-ready slide and night sights.
  • Bodyguard 2.0: MSRP of $449, typically retailing for $399–$419, offering strong value for a high-capacity pocket pistol.
Winner: Bodyguard 2.0. Its lower price provides comparable performance, freeing up budget for ammo or holsters.
Pros and Cons
Sig Sauer P365-380
Pros:
  • Softest recoil in class, great for recoil-sensitive shooters.
  • Optics-ready slide and SIGLITE night sights for versatility.
  • Proven P365 platform with high reliability.
  • Modular design with extended magazine options (up to 15+1).
  • Easy-to-rack slide for shooters with limited strength.
Cons:
  • Larger and heavier, less ideal for pocket carry.
  • Higher price point.
  • Some ammo-specific feeding issues.
Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0
Pros:
  • Smallest, lightest .380 for true pocket carry.
  • High capacity (10+1/12+1) in a compact package.
  • Excellent grip ergonomics and manageable recoil.
  • Affordable price.
  • Optional thumb safety for added security.
Cons:
  • No optics cut, limiting customization.
  • Early units had feeding and sight alignment issues.
  • Snappier recoil than P365-380.
Which Should You Choose?
  • Choose the P365-380 for a versatile, soft-shooting .380 with optics compatibility and a proven platform. It’s ideal for IWB or appendix carry, especially if you value night sights, modularity, or potential 9mm conversion. Its smooth trigger and minimal recoil suit range use and recoil-sensitive shooters.
  • Choose the Bodyguard 2.0 for pocket carry. Its smaller size, lighter weight, and lower price make it the ultimate deep-concealment .380, perfect for summer or minimalist wardrobes. A break-in period may be needed for optimal reliability.
Final Verdict
The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 wins for pocket carry, with its compact size, light weight, and ergonomic design earning accolades like the 2024 Handgun of the Year from Guns and Ammo. The Sig Sauer P365-380 is the better choice for holster carry, optics users, or those prioritizing shootability and versatility. Both are exceptional .380s, so test them at a range to find your perfect fit.
What’s your preference? Have you tried either, or do you favor another .380? Share your thoughts below!